2009년 9월 25일 금요일

Iconsoft Phone Extention 2.0에서 SK-SMS 제대로 사용하기

Iconsoft PhonEX 1.4X 버전에서는 영상통화 자체가 차단되었는데요..

2.0에서는 순정다이얼을 살려주는 버튼이 활성화 되었습니다. 영상통화 방법은 아래와 같습니다.


1.영상전화를 걸때 : 다이얼 패드의 순정다이얼(WM)버튼을 클릭하고 전화한다.

2.영상전화를 받을때 : 상대방이 영상전화임을 인지시에는 전화버튼을 클릭하여 다이얼패드 버튼을 활성화시키고, 역시

                               순정다이얼(WM)버튼을 클릭하여 영상전화를 수신한다.


SMS 연동을 위해서는 아래와 같이 레지스트리를 수정하면 되는 데요..다만 경로를 반드시 확인하세요..

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\ Software\ Iconsoft\ PhonEx\ General\ Options]:

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\ Software\ Iconsoft\ PhonEx\ Options]:
SMSClientApp    : \Windows\MMSC.exe(SK-SMS일경우, MS-SMS일경우는 tmail.exe정도?)

SMSClientParam : "1" "%s"


이렇게 해주시면 됩니다.


결론적으로 Iconsoft PhonEx 2.0에서 영상통화가 된다는 것이고요..

SMS 연결을 위한 레지스트리 경로가 변경되었으니 참고하세요..


smail 없이 sms 연결하기

재 부팅(?) 후,

 

 

Resco Editor로

 

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shell\Rai\:MSINBOX]

경로를 찾습니다.

 

화면에 보면 Default 값이 아래 표와 같이 되어 있을 것 입니다.

 

 Name

String

(Default)

(value not set)

0

 TMAIL

1

 tmail.exe

2

 0x0 (0)

3

 0x0 (0)

 

Name 항목

 1

 

String

tmail.exe

 

 

Name 항목

 1

 

String

\windows\KTFMMS.exe

\windows\MMSC.exe  (SK-SMS는 MMSC.exe로 입력해야 함

 

로 수정합니다.

 

 Name

String

(Default)

(value not set)

0

 TMAIL

1

\windows\MMSC.exe

2

 0x0 (0)

3

 0x0 (0)

 

Resco Editor의 하단 Menu -> Exit로 종료를 합니다.

 

소프트리셋


드뎌 저도 PhonEX에서 문자메세지를 보낼수 있게 되었습니다.

 


2009년 9월 3일 목요일

2009년 8월 26일 수요일

힘든 날이 지속된다...

몸은 힘들다.

그러나 마음은 더 힘들다..

몸보다는 마음이 힘든게 사람을 더 피곤하게 만든다.


처음에 작은 선택이었으나 지금은 뭔가를 흔들고 있는 큰 선택이 되어버렸다. 

내가 한 선택에 후회를 가지지 않기 위해서, 주위의 도움과 배려가 없어도, 제대로 된 아웃풋을 내고 싶다. 


가족이 있다는 것에 감사한다.

피곤함에 쩔어 집에 들어가서도 "나 왔어"라고 말했을 때, "수고했어"라고 말하며 안아주는 가족이 있어 힘들지만 행복하다.


힘들지만, 원하는 것과 바라는 것을 이루기 위해서 조금 더 힘내야겠다.

2009년 8월 12일 수요일

지금의 주식시장은 과열이 아닐까?

나는 전문가도 아니고, 아마추어 투자자다.
내돈과 가족들의 돈을 조금씩 주식시장에 투자하고 있는 아마추어..

그래도 돈을 잃지는 않았다. 수익이 날때까지 보유하거나 아니면 2%의 마이너스만 나도 팔아버리니까..
실력이 있다는게 아니라 겁이 많아서 손실이 없었다..

그런데 최근의 주식시장을 보면서 좀 불안하다.
뭔가 이상하게 돌아가고 있다는 생각이 든다.

분명히 시장이 돈은 많이 풀렸고, 풀린 돈이 갈데가 없어서 부동산이나 주식으로 몰리고 있다는 생각이 든다.
우리나라뿐만 아니라 외국도 마찬가지고..

그런데 지속적으로 긍정적인 이야기들이 나오고 있다.
한번 곰곰히 생각해보자.

정말 Fundamental이 좋아졌나? 기업의 수익은 환율효과에 의한 일시적인 착시현상에 가까운 것 같고, 현실적으로 서민들의 생활은 점점 어려워지고 있다.

돈이 실생활에서 도는게 아니라, 실생활과는 상관없는 곳에서만 돌고 있다. 결국 그건 거품이 끼게 마련이다.
기술적 반등이 일어나는건 하락 후에 당연히 일어나는 상황인거다.

지금은 아무래도 몸을 좀 사리고, 조금씩만 투자하는게 좋을만한 상황인 것 같다.
언제 터질지 모르는 폭탄 돌리기를 하고 있는 느낌이란 말이지...

2009년 7월 11일 토요일

GMAT math remainder Questions... Too Tough

원본글 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/collection-of-remainder-problems-in-gmat-74776.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have collected these problems on remainder. This type of problem is frequently asked in DS.
Answers are also given. Please dont mind any typo error.

1.If r is the remainder when the positive integer n is divided by 7, what is the value of r

1. when n is divided by 21, the remainder is an odd number
2. when n is divided by 28, the remainder is 3

The possible reminders can be 1,2,3,4,5 and 6. We have the pinpoint the exact remainder from this 6 numbers.

St 1: when n is divided by 21 ( 7 and 3) the remainder is an odd number.
But it cannot be 7, 3 or 9 . Hence the possibilities are : 1 and 5.
Hence there can be two remainders ,1 and 5, when divided by 7.
NOT SUFFICIENT

St 2: when n is divided by 28 the remainder is 3.
As 7 is a factor of 28, the remainder when divided by 7 will be 3
SUFFICIENT


2 If n and m are positive integers, what is the remainder when 3^(4n + 2 + m) is divided by 10 ?
(1) n = 2
(2) m = 1

The Concept tested here is cycles of powers of 3.

The cycles of powers of 3 are : 3,9,7,1

St I) n = 2. This makes 3^(4*2 +2 + m) = 3^(10+m). we do not know m and hence cannot figure out the unit digit.

St II) m=1 . This makes 3^(4*n +2 + 1).
4n can be 4,8,12,16...
3^(4*n +2 + 1) will be 3^7,3^11, 3^15,3^19 ..... in each case the unit digit will be 7. SUFF
Hence B


3.If p is a positive odd integer, what is the remainder when p is divided by 4 ?

(1) When p is divided by 8, the remainder is 5.

(2) p is the sum of the squares of two positive integers.


st1. take multiples of 8....divide them by 4...remainder =1 in each case...

st2. p is odd ,since p is square of 2 integers...one will be even and other odd....now when we divide any even square by 4 v ll gt 0 remainder..and when divide odd square vll get 1 as remainder......so intoatal remainder=1
Ans : D


4.If p and n are positive integers and p > n, what is the remainder when p^2 - n^2 is divided by 15 ?

(1) The remainder when p + n is divided by 5 is 1.

(2) The remainder when p - n is divided by 3 is 1.

Ans: E

st1) p+n=6,11,16....insuff.
st2) p-n=4,7,10....insuff...

multiply these two to get p^2-n^2.....multiplying any ttwo values from the above results in different remainder......

also can be done thru equation....p+n=5a+1..and so on


5.What is the remainder when the positive integer x is divided by 3 ?

(1) When x is divided by 6, the remainder is 2.

(2) When x is divided by 15, the remainder is 2.

Easy one , answer D

st 1...multiple of 6 will also be multiple of 3 so remainder wil be same as 2.

st2) multiple of 15 will also be multiple of 3....so the no.that gives remaindr 2 when divided by 15 also gives 2 as the remainder when divided by 3...


6.What is the remainder when the positive integer n is divided by 6 ?

(1) n is a multiple of 5.

(2) n is a multiple of 12.

Easy one. Answer B

st 1) multiples of 5=5,10,15....all gives differnt remainders with 6

st2)n is divided by 12...so it will be divided by 6...remainder=0


7If x, y, and z are positive integers, what is the remainder when 100x + 10y + z is divided by 7 ?

(1) y = 6

(2) z = 3

We need to know all the variables. We cannot get that from both the statements. Hence the answer is E.

8.If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when 4 + 7n is divided by 3, what is the value of r ?

(1) n + 1 is divisible by 3.

(2) n > 20

Answer A
st1... n+1 divisible by 3..so n=2,5,8,11......
this gives 4+7n=18,39,60....remainder 0 in each case......
st2) insufficient ....n can have any value


9.If n is a positive integer and r is the remainder when (n - 1)(n + 1) is divided by 24, what is the value of r ?

(1) n is not divisible by 2.

(2) n is not divisible by 3.

ST 1- if n is not divisible by 2, then n is odd, so both (n - 1) and (n + 1) are even. moreover, since every other even number is a multiple of 4, one of those two factors is a multiple of 4. so the product (n - 1)(n + 1) contains one multiple of 2 and one multiple of 4, so it contains at least 2 x 2 x 2 = three 2's in its prime factorization.
But this is not sufficient, because it can be (n-1)*(n+1) can be 2*4 where remainder is 8. it can be 4*6 where the remainder is 0.

ST 2- if n is not divisible by 3, then exactly one of (n - 1) and (n + 1) is divisible by 3, because every third integer is divisible by 3. therefore, the product (n - 1)(n + 1) contains a 3 in its prime factorization.
Just like st 1 this is not sufficient

the overall prime factorization of (n - 1)(n + 1) contains three 2's and a 3.
therefore, it is a multiple of 24.
sufficient

Answer C

2009년 7월 1일 수요일

유사 관계대명사 용법

보기A번

He bought sth for three times the price as I paid for it. (X)

유사관계대명사 as를 쓰려면, 선행사에 as/such/the same 와 같은 수식어가 있어야 쓸 수 있어요.

=> He bought sth for three times the price as I paid for it. (O)

A is sold for three times the price as the maker charges for B. (X)

A is sold for three times the price than the maker charges for B. (X)

A is sold for three times the price that the maker charges for B. (O) 배수사의 용법!

= A is sold for three times as high price as the maker charges for B. (O) 유사관계대명사 용법

= A is sold for three times higher price than the maker charges for B. (O) 유사관계대명사 용법

A is sold for three times the price of what the maker charges for B. (X)

A is sold for three times the price at which the maker charges for B. (X)

======================================================================================================================

<참고> 유사관계대명사 - as/ than/ but

 

1. as (선행사에 as/such/the same 이 있을 때)

He will buy such a car as speeds like a bullet. (주격) 유사함을 의미하는 such 때문에 that을 쓰면 안되고 as를 써야 함.

He will buy such a car as he saw yesterday. (목적격)

 

She is absent, as is often her case. (주격) 그녀가 결석인데, 그건 그녀에게 종종 있는 경우다

As is often the case, she is absent. (문두에 놓여서 관용구로 쓰임) 종종 있는 일이지만, 그녀는 결석이다.

 

* 외워두세요

As is often the case with ~ (~에게 흔히 있는 일이지만)

 

* 참고

He bought the same car as I bought. ==> 같은 종류의 서로 다른 두 개

He bought the same car that I bought. (X) ==> 동일한 한 개. 이 문장은 illogical 하므로 틀린 문장.

 

Tom loves the same girl as John loves. => 두 명의 similar girls

Tom loves the same girl that John love. => 한 명의 동일한 girl

 

2. than (선행사에 비교급이 있을 때)

She has more money than is necessary. (주격)

She has more money than she needs. (목적격)

 

3. but (선행사에 부정어가 있을 때 - no/not/rarely/little/less/few/scarcely/seldom...)

There is no boy but knows her name. (but 은 부정어가 들어있다) 그녀의 이름을 모르는 소년은 아무도 없다.

(= There is no boy who does not know her name.)

(= Every boy knows her name.)

2009년 6월 22일 월요일

AWA - issue (1)

연습 1.

Q. "The best way to preserve the natural enviornment is to impose penalties  - whether fines, imprisonment or other punishments - on those who are responsible for polluting or otherwise damaging it"

Discuss the extent to which you agree or diagree with the opinion expressed above. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.


Answer.

Most people have thought whether imposing penalites on person who resposible for polluting nature. Some people might agree with it. However, while imposing penalties might bring some advatages to the society, I disagree with it and believe that punishment for damaging environment  is not proper wayt to preserve it.

Admittedly, penalties have some good effects. In other word, punishments can let people not even to try harmful action. For example, no one even try to throw cigarette on the road in singapore because if someone dump his/her garbages in public space in sigapore, s/he might be punished with huge fines. Therefore, punishment have some positive effect to preserve environment.

However, more importantly, punishment have a delicate problem because it is too hard to recognize the responsible person who damage environment. For instance, if a worker in some factory dumps hazardous materials into a river beside the factory by his/her own decision, who is the responsible person for punishment? Is it the worker or higher ranked supervisor? Therefore, punishment for harmful action is not proper way.

In addition, the legislation of penalties can not pace up to the change of way of damaging and the expansion of pollutant substances. For example, if the government start to impose penalties on some polluting action, people will find another way to detour the punishment. Also, if legislations have been made for 20 harmful substances, someone who throw away a harmful chemical element not listed on the law into the river can not be punished. Thus, punishment for damaging environment is not proper way to preserve the nature.

In conclusion, it is true that punishment is easy way to prevent the nature damaged. However, the punishment has some important problems. Therefore, the government should choose not to impose penalities on someone who is responsible.